Evaluation of valganciclovir's neutropenia risk in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients utilizing two dosing regimens.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir is approved for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatrics using the Pescovitz algorithm. There are reports of valganciclovir overdoses in children with low body surface area and overestimated creatinine clearance utilizing this algorithm. This study compared the incidence of neutropenia and cytomegalovirus infection between the Pescovitz and weight-based dosing algorithms. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review from January 2010 to September 2018 was performed on pediatric heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients, who received valganciclovir. Data were collected from the initiation of valganciclovir prophylaxis to 30 days after discontinuation. The primary objective was the incidence of neutropenia in patients receiving valganciclovir dosed by the Pescovitz versus weight-based dosing algorithms. RESULTS: This study included 187 pediatric transplant recipients who received valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz (62 recipients) or weight-based dosing algorithms (125 recipients). The incidence of neutropenia was higher in the Pescovitz (69.4%) compared to the weight-based dosing group (53.6%; p = .04) including moderate and severe neutropenia. Cytomegalovirus viremia was not significantly different between the two groups and occurred in 4.8% of the Pescovitz group compared to 2.4% of the weight-based group (p = .4). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of neutropenia was greater in recipients receiving valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz algorithm compared to the weight-based dosing. There were no significant differences in regard to cytomegalovirus viremia or disease between the two groups.

Late-onset and long-lasting neutropenias in the young: A new entity anticipating immune-dysregulation disorders.

This study identifies a new chronic form of immune neutropenia in the young with or without detectable indirect anti-neutrophil antibodies, characterized by mild/moderate neutropenia low risk of severe infection (14%), tendency to develop autoimmune phenomena over the course of the disease (cumulative incidence of 58.6% after 20 years of disease duration), leukopenia, progressive reduction of absolute lymphocyte count and a T- and B-cell profile similar to autoimmune disorders like Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (increased HLADR+ and CD3 + TCRγδ cells, reduced T regulatory cells, increased double-negative B and a tendency to reduced B memory cells). In a minority of patients, P/LP variants related to primary immuno-regulatory disorders were found. This new form may fit the group of "Likely acquired neutropenia," a provisional category included in the recent International Guidelines on Diagnosis and Management of Neutropenia of EHA and EUNET INNOCHRON ACTION 18233. The early recognition of this form of neutropenia would help clinicians to delineate better specific monitoring plans, genetic counseling, and potentially targeted therapies.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS: This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02600897. FINDINGS: Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60-75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1-3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7-25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20-43). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Treatment recommendations for glycogen storage disease type IB- associated neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction with empagliflozin: Consensus from an international workshop.

Glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSD Ib, biallelic variants in SLC37A4) is a rare disorder of glycogen metabolism complicated by neutropenia/neutrophil dysfunction. Since 2019, the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin has provided a mechanism-based treatment option for the symptoms caused by neutropenia/neutrophil dysfunction (e.g. mucosal lesions, inflammatory bowel disease). Because of the rarity of GSD Ib, the published evidence on safety and efficacy of empagliflozin is still limited and does not allow to develop evidence-based guidelines. Here, an international group of experts provides 14 best practice consensus treatment recommendations based on expert practice and review of the published evidence. We recommend to start empagliflozin in all GSD Ib individuals with clinical or laboratory signs related to neutropenia/neutrophil dysfunction with a dose of 0.3-0.4 mg/kg/d given as a single dose in the morning. Treatment can be started in an outpatient setting. The dose should be adapted to the weight and in case of inadequate clinical treatment response or side effects. We strongly recommend to pause empagliflozin immediately in case of threatening dehydration and before planned longer surgeries. Discontinuation of G-CSF therapy should be attempted in all individuals. If available, 1,5-AG should be monitored. Individuals who have previously not tolerated starches should be encouraged to make a new attempt to introduce starch in their diet after initiation of empagliflozin treatment. We advise to monitor certain safety and efficacy parameters and recommend continuous, alternatively frequent glucose measurements during the introduction of empagliflozin. We provide specific recommendations for special circumstances like pregnancy and liver transplantation.

Two-year follow-up of lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in TRANSCEND NHL 001.

ABSTRACT: Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) demonstrated significant efficacy with a manageable safety profile as third-line or later treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 study. Primary end points were adverse events (AEs), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate (ORR) per independent review committee. Key secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). After 2-year follow-up, patients could enroll in a separate study assessing long-term (≤15 years) safety and OS. Liso-cel-treated patients (N = 270) had a median age of 63 years (range, 18-86 years) and a median of 3 prior lines (range, 1-8) of systemic therapy, and 181 of them (67%) had chemotherapy-refractory LBCL. Median follow-up was 19.9 months. In efficacy-evaluable patients (N = 257), the ORR was 73% and CR rate was 53%. The median (95% confidence interval) DOR, PFS, and OS were 23.1 (8.6 to not reached), 6.8 (3.3-12.7), and 27.3 months (16.2-45.6), respectively. Estimated 2-year DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 49.5%, 40.6%, and 50.5%, respectively. In the 90-day treatment-emergent period (N = 270), grade 3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 2% and 10% of patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs in treatment-emergent and posttreatment-emergent periods, respectively, were neutropenia (60% and 7%) and anemia (37% and 6%). Liso-cel demonstrated durable remissions and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals during the 2-year follow-up in patients with R/R LBCL. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02631044 and #NCT03435796.

Phase 1 Study of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Adjuvant Pancreatic Cancer (PROTON-PANC).

PURPOSE: Despite improvement in systemic therapy, patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently experience local recurrence. We sought to determine the safety of hypofractionated proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) during adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients were enrolled in a single-institution phase 1 trial (NCT03885284) between 2019 and 2022. Patients had PDAC of the pancreatic head and underwent R0 or R1 resection and adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the dosing schedule of adjuvant PBT (5 Gy × 5 fractions) using limited treatment volumes given between cycles 6 and 7 of mFFX. Patients received PBT on days 15 to 19 in a 28-day cycle before starting cycle 7 (dose level 1, DL1) or on days 8 to 12 in a 21-day cycle before starting cycle 7 (DL2). RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years (range, 52-78), and the follow-up time from mFFX initiation was 12.5 months (range, 6.2-37.4 months). No patients received preoperative therapy. Four had R1 resections and 5 had node-positive disease. Three patients were enrolled on DL1 and 6 patients on DL2. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at DL2 (prolonged grade 3 neutropenia resulting in discontinuation of mFFX after cycle 7). No other DLTs were observed. Four patients completed 12 cycles of mFFX (range, 7-12; median, 11). No patients have had local recurrence. Five of 9 patients had recurrence: 3 in the liver, 1 in the peritoneum, and 1 in the bone. Six patients are still alive, 4 of whom are recurrence-free. The median time to recurrence was 12 months (95% CI, 4 to not reached [NR]), and median overall survival was NR (95% CI, 6 to NR; 2-year survival rate, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: PBT integrated within adjuvant mFFX was well tolerated, and no local recurrence was observed. These findings warrant further exploration in a phase 2 trial.

Assessment of the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of a group of Turkish pediatric glycogen storage disease type 1b patients with varying clinical presentations and a novel mutation.

OBJECTIVES: Glycogen storage disease (GSD) type 1b is a multisystemic disease in which immune and infectious complications are present, different from GSD type 1a. Treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often required in the management of neutropenia and inflammatory bowel disease. Recently, an alternative treatment option to G-CSF has been preferred, like empagliflozin. To report on the demographics, genotype, clinical presentation, management, and complications of pediatric patients with glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD 1b). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical course of eight patients with GSD type 1b whose diagnosis was confirmed by molecular testing. RESULTS: The mean age at referral was four months. The diagnosis of GSD 1b was based on clinical and laboratory findings and supported by genetic studies. One patient presented with an atypical clinical finding in the form of hydrocephalus at the time of first admission. The first symptom was abscess formation on the scalp due to neutropenia in another patient. Other patients had hypoglycemia at the time of admission. All patients presented suffered from neutropenia, which was managed with G-CSF, except one. Hospitalizations for infections were frequent. One patient developed chronic diarrhea and severe infections, which have been brought under control with empagliflozin. CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia is an essential finding in GSD 1b and responsible for complications. The coexistence of hypoglycemia and neutropenia should bring to mind GSD 1b. Empagliflozin can be a treatment option for neutropenia, which is resistant to G-CSF treatment.

Lenalidomide in combination with R-ESHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase 2 study from GELTAMO.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) disease have poor outcomes with current salvage regimens. We conducted a phase 2 trial to analyse the safety and efficacy of adding lenalidomide to R-ESHAP (LR-ESHAP) in patients with RR DLBCL. Subjects received 3 cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle, in combination with R-ESHAP at standard doses. Responding patients underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) after 3 cycles. Centralized cell-of-origin (COO) classification was performed. Forty-six patients were included. The ORR after LR-ESHAP was 67% (35% of patients achieved complete remission). Patients with primary refractory disease (n = 26) had significantly worse ORR than patients with non-refractory disease (54% vs. 85%, p = 0.031). No differences in response rates according to the COO were observed. Twenty-eight patients (61%) underwent ASCT. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the estimated 3-year PFS and OS were 42% and 48%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (70% of patients), neutropenia (67%) and anaemia (35%). There were no treatment-related deaths during LR-ESHAP cycles. In conclusion, LR-ESHAP is a feasible salvage regimen with promising efficacy results for patients with RR DLBCL.

Body surface area compared to body weight dosing of valganciclovir is associated with increased toxicity in pediatric solid organ transplantation recipients.

Optimal dosing of valganciclovir (VGCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention in pediatric solid organ transplantation recipients (SOTR) is controversial. Dosing calculated based on body surface area (BSA) and creatinine clearance is recommended but simplified body weight (BW) dosing is often prescribed. We conducted a retrospective 6-center study to compare safety and efficacy of these strategies in the first-year posttransplant There were 100 (24.2%) pediatric SOTR treated with BSA and 312 (75.7%) with BW dosing. CMV DNAemia was documented in 31.0% vs 23.4% (P = .1) at any time during the first year and breakthrough DNAemia in 16% vs 12.2% (P = .3) of pediatric SOTR receiving BSA vs BW dosing, respectively. However, neutropenia (50% vs 29.3%, P <.001), lymphopenia (51% vs 15.0%, P <.001), and acute kidney injury causing treatment modification (8.0% vs 1.8%, P <.001) were documented more frequently during prophylaxis in pediatric SOTR receiving BSA vs BW dosing. The adjusted odds ratio of VGCV-attributed toxicities comparing BSA and BW dosing was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.7] for neutropenia, 7.0 (95% CI, 3.9-12.4) for lymphopenia, and 4.6 (95% CI, 2.2-9.3) for premature discontinuation or dose reduction of VGCV, respectively. Results demonstrate that BW dosing is associated with significantly less toxicity without any increase in CMV DNAemia.

Letermovir vs Valganciclovir for Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Valganciclovir for 200 days is standard care for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, but its use is limited by myelosuppression. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of letermovir with valganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor at 94 participating sites between May 2018 and April 2021 (final follow-up in April 2022). Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio (stratified by receipt of lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression) to receive letermovir, 480 mg, orally daily (with acyclovir) or valganciclovir, 900 mg, orally daily (adjusted for kidney function) for up to 200 days after transplant, with matching placebos. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CMV disease, confirmed by an independent masked adjudication committee, through posttransplant week 52 (prespecified noninferiority margin, 10%). CMV disease through week 28 and time to onset of CMV disease through week 52 were secondary outcomes. Exploratory outcomes included quantifiable CMV DNAemia and resistance. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was a prespecified safety outcome. Results: Among 601 participants randomized, 589 received at least 1 dose of the study drug (mean age, 49.6 years; 422 [71.6%] men). Letermovir (n = 289) was noninferior to valganciclovir (n = 297) for prevention of CMV disease through week 52 (10.4% vs 11.8% of participants with committee-confirmed CMV disease; stratum-adjusted difference -1.4% [95% CI, -6.5% to 3.8%]). No participants who received letermovir vs 5 participants (1.7%) who received valganciclovir developed CMV disease through week 28. Time to onset of CMV disease was comparable between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.56-1.47]). Quantifiable CMV DNAemia was detected in 2.1% of participants in the letermovir group vs 8.8% in the valganciclovir group by week 28. Of participants evaluated for suspected CMV disease or CMV DNAemia, none (0/52) who received letermovir and 12.1% (8/66) who received valganciclovir had resistance-associated substitutions. The rate of leukopenia or neutropenia through week 28 was lower with letermovir vs valganciclovir (26% vs 64%; difference, -37.9% [95% CI, -45.1% to -30.3%]; P < .001). Fewer participants in the letermovir group than the valganciclovir group discontinued prophylaxis due to adverse events (4.1% vs 13.5%) or drug-related adverse events (2.7% vs 8.8%). Conclusion and Relevance: Among adult CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, letermovir was noninferior to valganciclovir for prophylaxis of CMV disease over 52 weeks, with lower rates of leukopenia or neutropenia, supporting its use for this indication. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03443869; EudraCT: 2017-001055-30.

Neutropenia: A Brief Review.

Neutropenia is one of the most common abnormalities on complete blood count encountered in pediatric clinical practice. It causes anxiety in the pediatric clinician as well as in the patient and their family. Neutropenia can be inherited or acquired. Acquired neutropenia is much more common than inherited neutropenia. Acquired neutropenia self-resolves after the offending cause is removed, and therefore, most acquired neutropenia can be managed by primary care physicians, unless they are associated with severe infections. In contrast, inherited neutropenia needs to be managed in collaboration with the hematologist. [Pediatr Ann. 2023;52(6):e238-e241.].

Toxic Effects of Volume-modulated Arc Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the toxic effects associated with various factors, including the presence or absence of concurrent chemotherapy with volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dose parameters for esophageal cancer (EC), and to assess the safety and feasibility of the VMAT protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with EC who received definitive VMAT between December 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. VMAT plans were designed to deliver 60 Gy to the primary tumor, 54 Gy to high-risk sites, and 51.3 Gy to regional lymph node sites. Toxic effects were evaluated for esophagitis, neutropenia, esophageal stricture, pericardial effusion, radiation-associated pneumonia. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), while 29 were treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone. The following grade 3 complications were detected: Neutropenia in four patients (5.4%), esophagitis in two (2.7%), and esophageal stricture in one (1.4%). Grade 4 or more complications were not observed. The median age of the CCRT group (67 years) was significantly lower than that of the RT-alone group (77 years) (p<0.0001). The incidence of esophagitis was significantly higher in the CCRT group (75.5%) than in the RT group (48.3%) (p=0.033). The univariate analysis identified increasing mean dose to the pericardium as a significant risk factor for pericardial effusion, and CCRT and performance status ≥1 as significant for radiation-associated pneumonia. These factors were not significant in the multivariate analysis. Neutropenia and esophageal stricture were not associated with any factor examined. CONCLUSION: VMAT alone and in CCRT performed with our protocol was safe and feasible in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Upadacitinib Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of Crohn's disease. METHODS: In two phase 3 induction trials (U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED), we randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease to receive 45 mg of upadacitinib or placebo (2:1 ratio) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who had a clinical response to upadacitinib induction therapy were randomly assigned in the U-ENDURE maintenance trial to receive 15 mg of upadacitinib, 30 mg of upadacitinib, or placebo (1:1:1 ratio) once daily for 52 weeks. The primary end points for induction (week 12) and maintenance (week 52) were clinical remission (defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]) and endoscopic response (defined as a decrease in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD; range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] of >50% from baseline of the induction trial [or for patients with an SES-CD of 4 at baseline, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline]). RESULTS: A total of 526 patients underwent randomization in U-EXCEL, 495 in U-EXCEED, and 502 in U-ENDURE. A significantly higher percentage of patients who received 45-mg upadacitinib than those who received placebo had clinical remission (in U-EXCEL, 49.5% vs. 29.1%; in U-EXCEED, 38.9% vs. 21.1%) and an endoscopic response (in U-EXCEL, 45.5% vs. 13.1%; in U-EXCEED, 34.6% vs. 3.5%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). At week 52 in U-ENDURE, a higher percentage of patients had clinical remission with 15-mg upadacitinib (37.3%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (47.6%) than with placebo (15.1%), and a higher percentage had an endoscopic response with 15-mg upadacitinib (27.6%) or 30-mg upadacitinib (40.1%) than with placebo (7.3%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Herpes zoster infections occurred more frequently in the 45-mg and 30-mg upadacitinib groups than in the respective placebo groups, and hepatic disorders and neutropenia were more frequent in the 30-mg upadacitinib group than in the other maintenance groups. Gastrointestinal perforations developed in 4 patients who received 45-mg upadacitinib and in 1 patient each who received 30-mg or 15-mg upadacitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib induction and maintenance treatment was superior to placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. (Funded by AbbVie; U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03345849, NCT03345836, and NCT03345823.).

Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Receiving Parenteral Nutrition.

PURPOSE: Parenteral nutrition (PN) has been shown to be a safe method of feeding in the intensive care unit with modern infection prevention practices, but similar analysis in the hematology-oncology setting is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1,617 patients with hematologic malignancies admitted and discharged from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania during 3,629 encounters from 2017 to 2019 was undertaken to evaluate the association of PN administration with risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Proportions of mucosal barrier injury (MBI)-CLABSI and non-MBI-CLABSI were also compared between groups. RESULTS: Risk of CLABSI was associated with cancer type and duration of neutropenia but not with PN administration (odds ratio, 1.015; 95% CI, 0.986 to 1.045; P = .305) in a multivariable analysis. MBI-CLABSI comprised 73% of CLABSI in patients exposed to and 70% in patients not exposed to PN, and there was no significant difference between groups (χ2 = 0.06, P = .800). CONCLUSION: PN was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI in a sample of patients with hematologic malignancy with central venous catheters when adjusting for cancer type, duration of neutropenia, and catheter days. The high proportion of MBI-CLABSI highlights the effect of gut permeability within this population.

Perioperative TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: APOLLO-11 study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with S-1 and leucovorin (TAS-118) plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinical T3-4N1-3M0 gastric cancer received four courses of TAS-118 (40-60 mg/body, orally, twice daily for seven days) plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, intravenously, day one) every two weeks preoperatively followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative chemotherapy with either 12 courses of TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or eight courses of TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2). The primary endpoints were completion rates of preoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin and postoperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 monotherapy (Step 1) or TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin (Step 2). RESULTS: Among 45 patients enrolled, the preoperative chemotherapy completion rate was 88.9% (90% CI 78.0-95.5). Major grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (17.8%) and neutropenia (8.9%). The R0 resection rate was 95.6% (90% CI 86.7-99.2). Complete pathological response was achieved in 6 patients (13.3%). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in 31 patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy (Step 1, n = 11; Step 2, n = 20), and completion rates were 90.9% (95% CI 63.6-99.5) for Step 1 and 80.0% (95% CI 59.9-92.9) for Step 2. No more than 10% of grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in patients receiving Step 1. Hypokalaemia and neutropenia occurred in 3 and 2 patients, respectively, receiving Step 2. The 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 66.7% (95% CI 50.9-78.4) and 84.4% (95% CI 70.1-92.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative chemotherapy with TAS-118 plus oxaliplatin with D2 gastrectomy is feasible.

Interferon alfa-2b in patients with low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis and chemotherapy with DA-EPOCH-R in patients with high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lymphomatoid granulomatosis is a rare Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a median overall survival of less than 2 years. In this study, we hypothesised that low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis is immune-dependent and high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis is immune-independent. On the basis of this hypothesis, we investigated the activity and safety of new treatment with immunotherapy in patients with low-grade disease and standard chemotherapy in patients with high-grade disease. METHODS: In this open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients aged 12 years or older with untreated, or relapsed or refractory lymphomatoid granulomatosis at the National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Patients with low-grade disease received dose-escalated interferon alfa-2b, starting at 7·5 million international units subcutaneously three times per week for up to 1 year past best response, and patients with high-grade disease received six cycles every 3 weeks of intravenous, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R). Starting doses were 50 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for etoposide; 60 mg/m2 twice daily by mouth from day 1 to day 5 for prednisone; 0·4 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for vincristine; 750 mg/m2 intravenous on day 5 for cyclophosphamide; 10 mg/m2 per day as a continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4 (96 h) for doxorubicin; and 375 mg/m2 intravenous on day 1 for rituximab. The doses of doxorubicin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide were adjusted up or down on the basis of neutrophil and platelet nadirs. Patients with residual or progressive disease after initial therapy crossed over to alternative therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an overall response and the 5-year progression-free survival after initial or cross-over treatment. Analysis of response included all participants who underwent restaging imaging; safety analysis included all patients who received any dose of study drugs. The trial is open for enrolment and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00001379. FINDINGS: 67 patients were enrolled between Jan 10, 1991, and Sept 5, 2019 (42 [63%] were male). 45 patients received initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b (16 of whom crossed over to DA-EPOCH-R) and 18 received initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R (eight of whom crossed over to interferon alfa-2b); four underwent surveillance only. After initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b, the overall response was 64% (28 of 44 evaluable patients) with 61% (27 of 44) having a complete response, whereas, after cross-over treatment with interferon alfa-2b, the overall response was 63% (five of eight evaluable patients) with 50% (four of eight) having a complete response. After initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, the overall response was 76% (13 of 17 evaluable patients) with 47% (eight of 17) having a complete response, whereas, after cross-over treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, the overall response was 67% (ten of 15 evaluable patients) with 47% (seven of 15) having a complete response. 5-year progression-free survival was 48·5% (95% CI 33·2-62·1) after initial treatment with interferon alfa-2b, 50·0% (15·2-77·5) after cross-over treatment with interferon alfa-2b, 25·4% (8·2-47·2) after initial treatment with DA-EPOCH-R, and 62·5% (34·9-81·1) after cross-over treatment with DA-EPOCH-R. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in patients treated with interferon alfa-2b included neutropenia (27 [53%] of 51 patients), lymphopenia (24 [47%]), and leukopenia (24 [47%]). The four most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R included neutropenia (29 [88%] of 33 patients), leukopenia (28 [85%]), infection (18 [55%]), and lymphopenia (17 [52%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 13 (25%) of 51 patients receiving treatment with interferon alfa-2b and 21 (64%) of 33 patients receiving DA-EPOCH-R, with five treatment-related deaths: one thromboembolic, one infection, and one haemophagocytic syndrome with interferon alfa-2b, and one infection and one haemophagocytic syndrome with DA-EPOCH-R. INTERPRETATION: Interferon alfa-2b is efficacious for treating low-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis and hence reducing progression to high-grade disease, whereas patients with high-grade lymphomatoid granulomatosis showed expected responses to chemotherapy. Uncontrolled immune regulation of Epstein-Barr virus is hypothesised to result in the emergence of low-grade disease after chemotherapy, for which treatment with interferon alfa-2b is efficacious. FUNDING: Intramural Research Programs of the National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Pyrotinib alone or in combination with docetaxel in refractory HER2-positive gastric cancer: A dose-escalation phase I study.

AIM: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB small-molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor) was approved in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and showed great antitumor activity in preclinical studies of gastric cancer (GC). This study was first designed to prospectively assess pyrotinib in pretreated HER2-positive GC. METHODS: This multicenter, phase I study followed a standard "3 + 3" design and included two parts. In the pyrotinib part, pyrotinib was administered orally, once per day at dose levels of 240, 320, 400, and 480 mg. In the pyrotinib plus docetaxel part, patients received pyrotinib (qd, d1-21, q3W) combined with docetaxel (60 mg/m2 , d1, q3W) at dose levels of 240, 320, and 400 mg. Primary endpoints were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pyrotinib as monotherapy or coadministered with docetaxel. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled and received pyrotinib (n = 15) or pyrotinib plus docetaxel (n = 10). One DLT was observed in pyrotinib monotherapy part (Grade 3 uncontrolled diarrhea after supportive care) and pyrotinib plus docetaxel part (Grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia). In the pyrotinib monotherapy part, MTD was not reached. Diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The RP2D for pyrotinib monotherapy was recommended as 400 mg. After combining with docetaxel, the risk of leukopenia and neutropenia was increased. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported for four patients in the monotherapy part and for eight patients in the combination part. Mean t1/2 was approximately 20 h. Pyrotinib exposure was dose-dependent with a nonlinear relationship versus dose. There were five patients who had confirmed partial response (monotherapy: one each at 240, 400, and 480 mg dose cohort; combination therapy: two at 240 mg dose cohort), resulting in an objective response rate of 21% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib alone and combined with docetaxel showed acceptable toxicities in patients with pretreated HER2-positive GC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02378389.